Browse Source
Adding additional case statements for SET_FEATURE and CLEAR_FEATURE
- Ignoring (which is done by default) - Device, Interface and Endpoint variantssimple
Jacob Alexander
9 years ago
1 changed files with 12 additions and 2 deletions
+ 12
- 2
Output/pjrcUSB/arm/usb_dev.c
View File
| @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static void usb_setup() | |||
| data = reply_buffer; | |||
| break; | |||
| case 0x0082: // GET_STATUS (endpoint) | |||
| if (setup.wIndex > NUM_ENDPOINTS) | |||
| if ( setup.wIndex > NUM_ENDPOINTS ) | |||
| { | |||
| // TODO: do we need to handle IN vs OUT here? | |||
| endpoint0_stall(); | |||
| @@ -313,7 +313,12 @@ static void usb_setup() | |||
| data = reply_buffer; | |||
| datalen = 2; | |||
| break; | |||
| case 0x0102: // CLEAR_FEATURE (endpoint) | |||
| case 0x0100: // CLEAR_FEATURE (device) | |||
| case 0x0101: // CLEAR_FEATURE (interface) | |||
| // TODO: Currently ignoring, perhaps useful? -HaaTa | |||
| endpoint0_stall(); | |||
| return; | |||
| case 0x0102: // CLEAR_FEATURE (interface) | |||
| i = setup.wIndex & 0x7F; | |||
| if ( i > NUM_ENDPOINTS || setup.wValue != 0 ) | |||
| { | |||
| @@ -328,6 +333,11 @@ static void usb_setup() | |||
| // XXX: Ignoring seems to work, though this may not be the ideal behaviour -HaaTa | |||
| endpoint0_stall(); | |||
| return; | |||
| case 0x0300: // SET_FEATURE (device) | |||
| case 0x0301: // SET_FEATURE (interface) | |||
| // TODO: Currently ignoring, perhaps useful? -HaaTa | |||
| endpoint0_stall(); | |||
| return; | |||
| case 0x0302: // SET_FEATURE (endpoint) | |||
| i = setup.wIndex & 0x7F; | |||
| if ( i > NUM_ENDPOINTS || setup.wValue != 0 ) | |||